That surreal numbers is too difficult to understand. Looks unnecessarily complicated... I'm sure they could explain it in laymen's terms if they wanted to.
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Continue reading...
Quote
Stitching is a very versatile concept. There is nothing prescriptive which can say whether a manner of stitching is right or wrong.
Quote
It can be done by combining two or more spins of same or multiple positions
Quote
No. Because your playing selection is a dozen(however complicated your selection is using any attractive you would like to call it), your playing position is a dozen and there is no dependency created between your playing positions. It will naturally lead to house edge equation or lead to either side of spectirum depending on the spin sequence in the dataset you are using.
So, my example doesn't qualify as "stitching" because I failed to create dependency? But did I not "combine two or more spins"? Quote
Eve if you have done a simple let it ride on the dozen, then you would have stitched together two dozen bets giving you odds of a corner.
That's what I did, right - let it ride on the dozen? So, regardless of creating dependency, did I successfully stitch or not? Please try your best not to sound like a politician - or like the maths guy trying to explain surreal numbers! Continue reading...