Quote from: thelaw on Today at 01:52:53 AM
Well yes because you cant change the payout because its game rules. So you need to change the odds. If you change neither odds or payout, what have you changed that will allow long term winning? Nothing.
Exploiting physics is one and the most logical way of changing odds. Its not that I adore physics. Its just how our universe works. I didnt design it. I didnt choose the laws. Hocus pocus does not determine the winning number.
As people sometimes dont like the idea, I offer alternative suggestions. Precog is one.
Sure anyone can rely on short term winnings. But that still relies on luck. I dont care if thats how people want to play. Its just not what works in the long term. Relying on short term systems is fallacy. 1000 people could all use the same system, and most will lose, only some will win.
Continue reading...
Steve has taken a strong position when it comes to the math of this game. So if you don't present evidence that you can actually change the odds (which means no mechanical bet selection based purely on patterns), then he's out........no matter how many simulations you want to run.
Well yes because you cant change the payout because its game rules. So you need to change the odds. If you change neither odds or payout, what have you changed that will allow long term winning? Nothing.
Exploiting physics is one and the most logical way of changing odds. Its not that I adore physics. Its just how our universe works. I didnt design it. I didnt choose the laws. Hocus pocus does not determine the winning number.
As people sometimes dont like the idea, I offer alternative suggestions. Precog is one.
Sure anyone can rely on short term winnings. But that still relies on luck. I dont care if thats how people want to play. Its just not what works in the long term. Relying on short term systems is fallacy. 1000 people could all use the same system, and most will lose, only some will win.
Continue reading...