Quote from: Steve on December 23, 2016, 09:09:15 PM
Hey Steve,
Sorry for the late reply.
Well.......seeing as "precog" has never actually been proven scientifically under controlled conditions, then yes.......progressions are one step ahead......in that they do actually exist.
What I do know is that dozens of scientists over the years have been duped by people claiming to have "super-normal" powers including precognition. Hell, even our government poured millions into a remote-viewing scam that was no more complex than amateur-night at the Magic Castle.
Here's is guy that could fool nearly any high-level military personnel any day of the week:
But here is the real kicker, how many trials would you need before you were able to claim success with precognition?........same as any other bet selection I assume. Unfortunately, there's one catch. With a analog bet selection you can run the math to prove its failure long term, but with a "paranormal" bet selection you can just choose a random large number of trials (say 1,000,000) and call it a winning method.........no need for all that uncomfortable math.
The real question here is.........why did you personally buy into this bullsh*t? Might be worth going back and listening to former members of project Stargate on Coasttocoastam with Art Bell. Funny........they made a lot of predictions, but none of them came true...........probably just bad luck.
Finally, with regards to a player winning $200,000 in 1 session using your computers, maybe it's possible, but that would mean: $200,000 x 1 session per day (x365) = $73,000,000..............but it's possible.
I like you Steve........and I may have been born at night.........but I wasn't born last night.
Cheers!
Continue reading...
Law, are you saying precog is less credible than trying to beat roulette with progression? What do you actually know about it? And it's really hard to believe a computer player won with a few €5000 bets?
Hey Steve,
Sorry for the late reply.
Well.......seeing as "precog" has never actually been proven scientifically under controlled conditions, then yes.......progressions are one step ahead......in that they do actually exist.
What I do know is that dozens of scientists over the years have been duped by people claiming to have "super-normal" powers including precognition. Hell, even our government poured millions into a remote-viewing scam that was no more complex than amateur-night at the Magic Castle.
Here's is guy that could fool nearly any high-level military personnel any day of the week:
But here is the real kicker, how many trials would you need before you were able to claim success with precognition?........same as any other bet selection I assume. Unfortunately, there's one catch. With a analog bet selection you can run the math to prove its failure long term, but with a "paranormal" bet selection you can just choose a random large number of trials (say 1,000,000) and call it a winning method.........no need for all that uncomfortable math.
The real question here is.........why did you personally buy into this bullsh*t? Might be worth going back and listening to former members of project Stargate on Coasttocoastam with Art Bell. Funny........they made a lot of predictions, but none of them came true...........probably just bad luck.
Finally, with regards to a player winning $200,000 in 1 session using your computers, maybe it's possible, but that would mean: $200,000 x 1 session per day (x365) = $73,000,000..............but it's possible.
I like you Steve........and I may have been born at night.........but I wasn't born last night.
Cheers!
Continue reading...