Who's talking about wheel bias analysis?
I'm talking about wheel watcher/visual ballistics without a computer. The edge with a computer tends to be much lower, not higher.
They're cumbersome. They continually require resets, reprogramming, and they rely on data entry points, rather than observation.
An experienced vb player has an edge that's quite a bit higher than a computer player.
Such a player can:
1. More effectively detect the long/short ball
2. More rapidly adjust to changing playing conditions without having to "run to the bathroom" in order to reprogram.
3. Visual observation doesn't rely on ball timing clicks and isn't subject to ball click errors. (Yes, I'm aware of error correction, but the error correction introduces a fuzzy prediction.
4. The physics of the ball behavior can be observed directly throughout the spin, rather than breifly observed solely through a couple or few data points via ball clicks. This enables a more accurate prediction of the ball flight.
5. Vb play is more discrete and has a more natural appearance to it, unlike the "lame/frozen arm" that often accompanies the computer player.
6. Vb is legal, computer play is a felony.
-Really
I'm talking about wheel watcher/visual ballistics without a computer. The edge with a computer tends to be much lower, not higher.
They're cumbersome. They continually require resets, reprogramming, and they rely on data entry points, rather than observation.
An experienced vb player has an edge that's quite a bit higher than a computer player.
Such a player can:
1. More effectively detect the long/short ball
2. More rapidly adjust to changing playing conditions without having to "run to the bathroom" in order to reprogram.
3. Visual observation doesn't rely on ball timing clicks and isn't subject to ball click errors. (Yes, I'm aware of error correction, but the error correction introduces a fuzzy prediction.
4. The physics of the ball behavior can be observed directly throughout the spin, rather than breifly observed solely through a couple or few data points via ball clicks. This enables a more accurate prediction of the ball flight.
5. Vb play is more discrete and has a more natural appearance to it, unlike the "lame/frozen arm" that often accompanies the computer player.
6. Vb is legal, computer play is a felony.
A computer player relies on ball timing and isn't accurate to within one ms (millisecond) either because of ball timing/click errors. Claiming that a roulette computer user is that accurate is ludicrous. Since the vb player is observing the ball and all of it's behavior he can account for more of the physics involved, such as ball chatter, slide, spin, that may cause more irregular ball decay outside of model. In other words, a real vb player isn't relying on just ball timing. Ball timing can and sometimes will provide the player with a small edge, but it's very primitive because such a player is missing out on the other physics involved.If you are talking about vb, no vb player is capable of 1ms timing accuracy, or any level required to assess often important factors such as diamond hits and scatter reduction. There are some wheels and conditions where vb will have comparable accuracy to computers. This isnt the case with typical modern wheels in good condition.
-Really